Abstract:
In the plasma arc welding process, the current used and the speed at which the torch moves are two important factors in determining the properties of a weld. We make a number of plasma welds using different currents and speeds. Real-time temperature data is taken and analyzed using the current mathematical model. Cross sections of the welds are inspected with a microscope. We attempt to use a mathematical temperature model to explain the different structural regions of the weld seen under the microscope.
Introduction:
The
plasma arc welding of stainless steel is a vital part of many industrial
processes. Two of the most important
factors in determining the properties of a plasma arc weld are the speed with
which the weld is made and the amount of current used to make the weld. A better understanding of how these two
conditions affect plasma arc welds could lead to more efficient welding
processes. In this project we will
create a database of welds which were made at various speeds and currents,
keeping all other factors constant. We
will then be able to analyze the physical properties of the welds to determine
the affects of both speed and current on the final weld properties. This database of welds can be used to verify
the accuracy of a MathCad program that will numerically model the welding
process and predict weld parameters based on a known weld speed and current.
In
previous work an incomplete database of welds was compiled and organized. Our intention is to fill in all gaps that
exist in this file as well as extend it, and perhaps make repeats of certain
welds to make comparisons. The table
below shows images of the cross-sections of the previously completed welds.

Table 1: Previous year’s collected database of plasma welds
The
temperature of the samples during the welding process is also of interest, as
temperature affects the micro structure of the metal and therefore its
properties.
Temperature
data can be taken directly, using thermocouples, or indirectly with an infrared
camera. In our experiments we will use
both methods and compare the results to determine which is the most accurate
and efficient method of recording temperature data.
Experimental
Setup and Design:
Using
a Staubli plasma arc welder we welded 1/8" x 1" x 3" samples of
stainless steel at various speeds and currents. The length of the plasma arc was kept constant at 2mm. We
recorded the welding process using an Inframetrics 600 infrared camera,
creating images similar to the following one.


Figure 1: IR Camera Image Figure 2: Thermocouples
ultra-sonically
For
several of the samples we also welded four thermocouples leads around the
welding path using an ultrasonic welder.
These thermocouples were fed into a Hydra Fluke Data Acquisition
Unit and temperature vs. time data was
gathered during the welding process using a LabView program. These thermocouple readings were then
compared to the temperature readings taken from the infrared recording at the
same point.
![]()
Figure 3: Entire laboratory set-up including: robot, infrared camera, fluke
hydra, television and computer.
After
all samples were welded, they were cut at a point where the weld was consistant
for cross-sectional inspection. The
samples were placed in self-hardening clear plastic molds for easier viewing
under the microscope. The molds and
cross-sections were polished in a five step process, down to 0.05 micron
tolerance, to remove all scratches. Finally the cross sections were chemically
etched to make the metal structure visible.
visible
weld
![]()

Figure 4: Cross section of welded
stainless steel sample, mounted in plastic mold
Samples
were inspected under a microscope. The
width, depth and varying structural regions of each individual weld were
recorded.
Results:
Discussion:
Conclusion: