Physician Antibiotic Prescribing Practices and Knowledge in Seven Countries in Latin America and the Caribbean

A PAHO/APUA Report, January 2002

Aníbal Sosa, MD and Karin Travers, DSc

Full text

Summary

  • The survey results showed a general lack of physician training on antibiotic use in Latin America (46% of physicians took informal courses and 17.9% received formal training). The length of formal training (whether short- or long-term) had no significant effect on appropriate antibiotic usage.
  • A general lack of antibiotic resistance surveillance information points to a need for more surveillance networks, increased linkages where they exist, and increased dissemination of data. Reference laboratories, likewise, are either lacking and/or physicians are unaware of their existence; 62.9% of respondents stated that they do not have access to such a lab.
  • There is an urgent need for consumer education as self-medication rates are high in these targeted countries and availability of written educational materials for consumers on proper compliance with antibiotic treatment is low. Almost 91% of physicians stated that there were no consumer education efforts in their countries that address antibiotic use and abuse and its consequences.
  • There is a significant need for the collection and dissemination of more local antibiotic resistance data to improve prescribing patterns and patient outcomes. Physicians have little geographically pertinent information available regarding their local disease specific resistance levels. Physicians also cite a lack of access to information on local resistance patterns (only 16% say they have this type of information) and to written information on infectious diseases of local importance and recommended treatments for them (less than 20% say they have this type of information).
  • There is an acute need to raise physician awareness regarding resistance patterns. One-third or less of physicians surveyed was aware of resistance patterns for shigella, salmonella & S. pneumoniae. Seventy-four percent of respondents did not know if the resistance information was applicable to the geographic area where they work.
  • There is a general lack of information for physicians to appropriately treat ARI (acute respiratory infections) and ADI (acute diarrheal infections) empirically. Only 57.5% and 33.8% of responders demonstrating such knowledge when presented with ARI and ADI clinical cases, respectively.
  • Respondents report that ARI/pneumonia was the primary reason for prescribing antibiotics (27%), followed by pharyngotonsillitis (15%) and UTIs (9%).
  • When faced with a gram-positive bacteria, most physicians reported using penicillins (PCN, semi synthetic penicillins, beta-lactams) as their first option (64%), followed by cephalosporins (12%) and quinolones (6%).

This publication was made possible through support provided by the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO). The opinions expresses herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Pan American Health Organization. Contributors to this report included Stuart Levy, MD, APUA President, Kathy Young, Executive Director, Kerry West, APUA International Program Assistant, Laura Raymond, APUA Program Manager and Laura Krech, MPH, Consultant.

 

ALLIANCE FOR THE PRUDENT USE OF ANTIBIOTICS © 1999

| Home | About APUA | Int'l Chapters | Contact Us | Search |
|
Consumer Information | Practitioner Information | Research & Surveillance | News |