TCCS logo
Tufts Computing and Communications Services
 FSP LookupInfoboardSearchSite Map
 Inside TCCS Services Resources & Support About TCCS IT Organization Policies & Standards Home
 subtopic off
 subtopic off
 subtopic off
 subtopicon
 subtopic off
 subtopic off
 subtopic off
 subtopic off
 subtopic off
 subtopic off
 subtopic off
 subtopic off
 subtopic off
 subtopic off
 How can we help you? go photo

Policies & Standards

Computer Crime

New Massachusetts Computer Crime Law
In 1995, the Massachusetts legislature enacted legislation designed to punish and help deter several forms of computer crime. Up until the passage of this legislation, it was a crime to completely remove data from a computer system without authorization - damaging data left on a system and "snooping" in systems were not prohibited. The new law changed this. Specifically, this legislation:

  • Prohibits unauthorized access to any computer system, either directly or by network or telephone. The law provides that the use of password authorization systems to control access to a computer system puts people on notice that their access is unauthorized if they don't have a legitimate password.
  • Amends the criminal vandalism statute to make it clear that electronically stored or processed data is "property", the destruction or corruption of which is illegal.
  • Prohibits the theft of commercial computer service.
The law also made two improvements to Massachusetts procedural law allowing easier prosecution of computer related offenses with less disruption to legitimate business. Previously, businesses whose systems had been violated were deterred from actively prosecuting the offense because they might be faced with prosecutors having to seize originals of their computer and data files. The updated computer crime law makes electronic copies of these files admissible, thus allowing a business to maintain use of its systems for ongoing operations. It also provides that computer crime may be prosecuted and punished either in the county where the perpetrator was physically located at the time he or she committed the crime, or in the county where the computer system and data that was accessed or corrupted was located at the time of the violation. This means, for example, that a hacker accessing a Massachusetts based business's computers in Massachusetts from another state would be susceptible to prosecution in Massachusetts.

 

Tufts University © 2001 Tufts University   |   Contact Us