While deciding on a particular information resource might not be as
crucial a decision as buying a car, the process of checking out standard
criteria still applies. And, if you continue on in research and undertake
evermore significant research projects, these decisions will take on a
great deal more importance!
Criteria for Evaluating Library Resources
Ask yourself the following questions about the criteria listed
above.
The answers will help you decide if the sources you found are
authoritative and useful. And, of course, these questions apply to print
library sources, as well as World Wide Web resources.
Authorship and Affiliation
- Who is the author of the book/article/Web site?
- Is the author a well-known and well-regarded authority in biology?
- Mainly for print resources: How reputable is the publisher?
- Does the author list her/his credentials (e.g., education,
occupation, etc.) for being an authority on the material?
- Does the author's email address appear so you can contact her/him for
further information?
- Does the author note her/his institutional affiliation (university,
government, organization, etc.)?
Accuracy/Verifiability
Note about Web resources: Because anyone can make public a Web site with
no review process, a small but vocal minority of junky Web sites exists.
Added to this is the thinking that material found via a computer is
more accurate than that found in books and other print resources.
Nothing could be further from the truth! So, it's critical to judge the
veracity of the information presented even more vigilantly than you do
print resources.
- How reliable and free from error (typographically, factually, and
conceptually) is the information?
- Are the author's methods for obtaining data or conducting
research clearly stated so that the study may be duplicated?
- Does the author demonstrate knowledge of scientific theories and
techniques?
- Mainly for print resources: Does the material include a bibliography?
- For Web resources: Are the links to relevant information?
Objectivity
- Is the material presented as fact or opinion?
- Is the information presented with a minimum of bias?
- To what extent is the information trying to sway the opinion of the
audience?
- For Web resources: Do the pages act as a virtual soapbox?
Audience
- Is the material sufficiently scholarly, yet not so complicated that
you can't understand it?
Currency
- When was the material published?
- For Web resources: Is the last update prominently noted?
- Does the material present the latest thinking on the topic?
- Is currency an important factor for the material that is presented?
Content/Purpose
- Is the purpose (to inform, explain, persuade or entertain) of the
material apparent?
- What topics are included in the material?
- Are the topics that are included explored in appropriate depth?
- If the material is available in both print and Web format, does
coverage differ between versions?
- Is supporting material, such as bibliographies; indexes; charts; maps;
and other graphics, included and correctly attributed?
- How comprehensive is the coverage of the material?
Comparison to Other Similar Materials
- Are there other resources that present the same information, and how
do they compare, generally, to this one?
In Conclusion. . .
- Given your answers to the above questions, is the material
authoritative and suitable for your research?
Remember:
- Learning to make educated judgements about the veracity of information
is a useful skill that will benefit you in the library, the classroom, the
laboratory, and as a consumer of information in all forms.
- Evaluation of print and Web materials is an ongoing process.
- Due to the continual evolution of the World Wide Web, resources that
you find there should be evaluated as stringently as possible.
- Never use information that you can't verify.
Acknowledgments
Credit for this page is paid to Jan Alexander and Marsha Tate at Wolfgram
Memorial Library, Widener University, Chester, PA; Carol Leita at
California's InfoPeople Project; and Elizabeth Kirk at the Eisenhower
Library, Johns Hopkins University. For more information, take a look at:
Return to
Library Research Homepage